Cherokee vs Okinawan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Okinawan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Okinawans

Fair
Excellent
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,907
SOCIAL INDEX
86.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
39th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Okinawan Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,998,873 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Okinawans within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.796. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.196% in Okinawans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 195.6 Okinawans.
Cherokee Integration in Okinawan Communities

Cherokee vs Okinawan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,203 compared to $55,817, a difference of 50.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $119,349, a difference of 47.6%), and median family income ($88,209 compared to $129,979, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.6%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $54,701, a difference of 14.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $70,846, a difference of 30.9%).
Cherokee vs Okinawan Income
Income MetricCherokeeOkinawan
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Exceptional
$55,817
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Exceptional
$129,979
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Exceptional
$106,624
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Exceptional
$57,550
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Exceptional
$67,232
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Exceptional
$46,905
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Exceptional
$54,701
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Exceptional
$119,349
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Exceptional
$124,796
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Exceptional
$70,846
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
28.1%

Cherokee vs Okinawan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 61.4%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 53.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.83%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 8.9%).
Cherokee vs Okinawan Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeOkinawan
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
12.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
13.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
13.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
13.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
18.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
14.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
26.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Exceptional
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Average
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
8.9%

Cherokee vs Okinawan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 59.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 42.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.7%).
Cherokee vs Okinawan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeOkinawan
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
16.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Fair
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Fair
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.7%

Cherokee vs Okinawan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 22.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.8%).
Cherokee vs Okinawan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeOkinawan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Good
79.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Tragic
32.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Tragic
72.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Good
83.0%

Cherokee vs Okinawan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 41.6%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 36.2%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.9% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.96%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
Cherokee vs Okinawan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeOkinawan
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
62.5%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Poor
27.2%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Exceptional
47.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Excellent
47.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
10.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Exceptional
26.9%

Cherokee vs Okinawan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 81.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 40.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 7.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 16.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 31.8%).
Cherokee vs Okinawan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeOkinawan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Tragic
86.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Tragic
51.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
17.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
5.5%

Cherokee vs Okinawan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 125.8%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 122.2%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 99.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.12%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.16%).
Cherokee vs Okinawan Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeOkinawan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
94.8%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Exceptional
91.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Exceptional
73.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Exceptional
69.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Exceptional
57.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
50.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
22.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
7.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
3.3%

Cherokee vs Okinawan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 65.1%), vision disability (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 64.1%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 60.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 11.9%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 31.0%).
Cherokee vs Okinawan Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeOkinawan
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.3%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
9.8%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
20.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Exceptional
44.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.2%