Cherokee vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,139,771 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 2.3 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,203 compared to $50,575, a difference of 35.9%), median household income ($72,682 compared to $95,146, a difference of 30.9%), and median family income ($88,209 compared to $115,230, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $53,294, a difference of 11.4%), and median female earnings ($34,742 compared to $42,446, a difference of 22.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 33.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 31.4%), and family poverty (10.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 30.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 25.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.91%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 25.4%), single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 21.3%), and births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.9% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.93%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.96%), and married-couple households (46.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 31.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 80.8%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 72.4%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 60.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.050%), 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.050%), and 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 47.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 40.9%), and vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 23.3%).