Cherokee vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,871,563 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.280. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 10.0 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Pima communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 29.8%), per capita income ($37,203 compared to $30,644, a difference of 21.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $73,365, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,742 compared to $35,326, a difference of 1.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $82,821, a difference of 2.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $50,539, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Pima communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 98.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 97.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 80.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 11.8%), single female poverty (25.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 18.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 25.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 125.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 103.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 88.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 22.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 18.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 10.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 59.2%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 40.4%), and married-couple households (46.7% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.4%), family households (65.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 82.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (30.2% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 30.1%), associate's degree (38.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 28.6%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.10%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 66.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (28.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 36.9%), and male disability (14.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (14.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.48%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 4.4%).