Cherokee vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Cuba
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Immigrants from Cuba

Fair
Fair
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,627
SOCIAL INDEX
33.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
214th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Cuba Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 300,963,395 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.075. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 3.0 Immigrants from Cuba.
Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from Cuba Communities

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Cuba Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 22.7%), householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $44,735, a difference of 21.0%), and median family income ($88,209 compared to $78,249, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,742 compared to $33,291, a difference of 4.4%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $50,374, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $76,701, a difference of 5.4%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Cuba Income
Income MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Cuba
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Tragic
$34,910
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Tragic
$78,249
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Tragic
$68,461
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Tragic
$38,426
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Tragic
$43,461
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Tragic
$33,291
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Tragic
$50,374
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Tragic
$76,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Tragic
$80,662
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Tragic
$44,735
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
22.4%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Cuba Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 65.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 63.6%), and receiving food stamps (13.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 57.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.3%), poverty (14.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and female poverty (15.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 3.5%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Cuba Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Cuba
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
14.6%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
11.3%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
16.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
16.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Tragic
19.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
18.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
18.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Fair
21.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Average
16.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Tragic
30.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
7.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Tragic
17.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Tragic
19.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
20.8%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Cuba Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 39.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 34.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 8.2%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 9.1%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Cuba Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Cuba
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
16.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
8.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
5.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Exceptional
3.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
7.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.2%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Cuba Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 33.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.4%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Cuba Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Cuba
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Tragic
64.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Tragic
30.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Tragic
72.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
83.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
83.7%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Cuba Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 13.1%), divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 10.9%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 2.6%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Cuba Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Cuba
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
68.2%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Tragic
44.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.26
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
7.5%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Tragic
43.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
15.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Tragic
41.5%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Cuba Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 36.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 22.6%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 8.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 12.5%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Cuba Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Cuba
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
8.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Exceptional
91.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Average
55.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
5.7%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Cuba Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 62.2%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 23.5%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (30.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 0.45%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Cuba Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Cuba
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
95.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
93.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
93.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
92.2%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Tragic
90.2%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Tragic
88.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Tragic
87.5%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Tragic
83.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
80.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Tragic
55.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Tragic
50.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Tragic
39.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
30.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
10.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.2%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Cuba Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (8.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 62.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 59.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 55.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 10.0%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Cuba Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Cuba
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.9%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Fair
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Fair
47.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
16.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.8%