Cherokee vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,222,004 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.590. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 15.4 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,203 compared to $52,649, a difference of 41.5%), median family income ($88,209 compared to $120,301, a difference of 36.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $108,926, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.7%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $52,783, a difference of 10.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $67,326, a difference of 24.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 49.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 49.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 48.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 11.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 15.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 37.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 27.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 32.3%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.8%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.5%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.11, a difference of 2.5%), and currently married (46.9% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 26.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 26.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 89.6%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 77.3%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 74.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.18%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 51.9%), vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 46.8%), and ambulatory disability (7.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 8.1%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 11.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 25.4%).