Cherokee vs Cajun Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,094,693 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cajuns within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.131. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Cajuns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 2.2 Cajuns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 23.6%), median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $52,325, a difference of 7.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $45,338, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($37,203 compared to $37,527, a difference of 0.87%), median family income ($88,209 compared to $87,157, a difference of 1.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $82,393, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (25.7% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 19.4%), single male poverty (16.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 18.8%), and single father poverty (19.6% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.6%), receiving food stamps (13.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 26.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 11.7%), single mother households (6.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 7.6%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.29%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.32%), and currently married (46.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 29.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 19.2%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.77%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 57.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in college, under 1 year (60.1% compared to 57.3%, a difference of 4.8%), associate's degree (38.9% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and college, 1 year or more (53.2% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.010%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 10.3%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (14.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 0.020%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.75%), and disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 50.7%, a difference of 0.84%).