Cherokee vs Portuguese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,107,597 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Portuguese within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.038. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Portuguese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 1.3 Portuguese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $99,429, a difference of 23.0%), median household income ($72,682 compared to $88,976, a difference of 22.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $105,309, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.20%), householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $61,440, a difference of 13.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $54,436, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 31.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 29.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.40%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and receiving food stamps (13.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 16.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 12.8%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 8.4%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.12%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.54%), and currently married (46.9% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 10.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.91%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 23.4%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 22.6%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.5% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 0.0%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 29.4%), vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 28.4%), and ambulatory disability (7.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 5.6%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.6%).