Cherokee vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 288,857,744 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.143. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 11.2 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 19.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $91,574, a difference of 13.3%), and median household income ($72,682 compared to $82,070, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $54,958, a difference of 1.5%), median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $51,596, a difference of 6.0%), and median family income ($88,209 compared to $95,114, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 30.9%), single male poverty (16.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 28.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and female poverty (15.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 18.0%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 28.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 16.9%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 10.2%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.010%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.32, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 194.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 73.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 63.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 18.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 42.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 63.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 69.9%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 23.1%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.41%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 67.6%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 62.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 50.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 4.3%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.7%).