Cherokee vs Asian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Asian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Asians

Fair
Excellent
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,712
SOCIAL INDEX
84.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
56th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Asian Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,327,356 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Asians within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.315. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.023% in Asians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 23.0 Asians.
Cherokee Integration in Asian Communities

Cherokee vs Asian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Asian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($72,682 compared to $101,681, a difference of 39.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $112,666, a difference of 39.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $118,426, a difference of 37.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.8%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $57,003, a difference of 19.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $68,822, a difference of 27.1%).
Cherokee vs Asian Income
Income MetricCherokeeAsian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Exceptional
$50,057
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Exceptional
$119,955
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Exceptional
$101,681
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Exceptional
$53,690
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Exceptional
$63,827
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Exceptional
$44,586
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Exceptional
$57,003
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Exceptional
$112,666
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Exceptional
$118,426
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Exceptional
$68,822
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
26.9%

Cherokee vs Asian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Asian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 55.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 50.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.15%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.7%).
Cherokee vs Asian Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeAsian
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
18.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Exceptional
11.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
14.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
13.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
13.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
13.7%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
14.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
26.0%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Excellent
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
9.7%

Cherokee vs Asian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Asian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 39.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 26.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.45%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.8%).
Cherokee vs Asian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeAsian
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Good
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
16.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.1%

Cherokee vs Asian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Asian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 18.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.0%).
Cherokee vs Asian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeAsian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
83.4%

Cherokee vs Asian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Asian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 36.9%), divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 29.1%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.4%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.28, a difference of 3.0%), and currently married (46.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.2%).
Cherokee vs Asian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeAsian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
66.5%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Exceptional
29.1%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Exceptional
49.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.28
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Exceptional
26.8%

Cherokee vs Asian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Asian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 16.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 10.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 10.4%).
Cherokee vs Asian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeAsian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Exceptional
91.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Exceptional
57.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Exceptional
20.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.0%

Cherokee vs Asian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Asian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 67.3%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 67.2%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 62.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.090%), 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.66%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.72%).
Cherokee vs Asian Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeAsian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
95.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
95.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
94.5%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Average
92.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Good
91.4%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Good
89.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Exceptional
69.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Exceptional
52.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
44.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
18.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
5.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.4%

Cherokee vs Asian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Asian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 64.7%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 63.2%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 53.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 7.0%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.8%).
Cherokee vs Asian Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeAsian
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Excellent
46.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.3%