Cherokee vs Iroquois Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Iroquois

Fair
Fair
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iroquois Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,667,262 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.488. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.161% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 160.5 Iroquois.
Cherokee Integration in Iroquois Communities

Cherokee vs Iroquois Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 9.3%), per capita income ($37,203 compared to $39,104, a difference of 5.1%), and median female earnings ($34,742 compared to $36,408, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $53,737, a difference of 0.74%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $47,380, a difference of 0.99%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $87,255, a difference of 1.3%).
Cherokee vs Iroquois Income
Income MetricCherokeeIroquois
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Tragic
$39,104
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Tragic
$90,543
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Tragic
$74,279
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Tragic
$42,430
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Tragic
$49,374
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Tragic
$36,408
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Tragic
$47,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Tragic
$83,682
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Tragic
$87,255
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Tragic
$53,737
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Excellent
25.1%

Cherokee vs Iroquois Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 16.5%), single male poverty (16.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 10.8%), and single father poverty (19.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (25.7% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 0.32%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 0.71%), and single mother poverty (34.5% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 0.91%).
Cherokee vs Iroquois Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeIroquois
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Tragic
17.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
20.4%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
13.5%

Cherokee vs Iroquois Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.74%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.76%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.78%).
Cherokee vs Iroquois Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeIroquois
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.7%

Cherokee vs Iroquois Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 0.73%).
Cherokee vs Iroquois Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeIroquois
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
80.6%

Cherokee vs Iroquois Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (46.7% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 6.8%), divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.74%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.82%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.2%).
Cherokee vs Iroquois Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeIroquois
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Tragic
43.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Tragic
38.2%

Cherokee vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 41.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 18.3%).
Cherokee vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeIroquois
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Average
19.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Good
6.5%

Cherokee vs Iroquois Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 13.5%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 12.2%), and associate's degree (38.9% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
Cherokee vs Iroquois Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeIroquois
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Average
89.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Tragic
42.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
33.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.6%

Cherokee vs Iroquois Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 21.8%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 13.7%), and ambulatory disability (7.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.59%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.7%).
Cherokee vs Iroquois Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeIroquois
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.7%