Cherokee vs Immigrants from Thailand Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Thailand
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Immigrants from Thailand

Fair
Fair
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,353
SOCIAL INDEX
31.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
224th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Thailand Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 297,255,306 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.424. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Immigrants from Thailand. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 4.5 Immigrants from Thailand.
Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from Thailand Communities

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Thailand Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($72,682 compared to $83,327, a difference of 14.6%), per capita income ($37,203 compared to $42,289, a difference of 13.7%), and median family income ($88,209 compared to $99,840, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $50,645, a difference of 5.9%), median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $52,908, a difference of 8.7%), and median earnings ($41,252 compared to $45,598, a difference of 10.5%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Thailand Income
Income MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Thailand
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Poor
$42,289
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Poor
$99,840
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Fair
$83,327
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Fair
$45,598
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Poor
$52,908
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Poor
$38,810
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Tragic
$50,645
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Poor
$91,337
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Poor
$97,400
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Fair
$60,217
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
24.5%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Thailand Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (19.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 24.2%), single male poverty (16.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 23.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.35%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.9%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Thailand Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Thailand
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
13.3%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
9.7%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
14.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Tragic
18.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
17.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
15.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Poor
29.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Average
12.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Poor
12.4%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Thailand Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 20.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.94%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.7%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Thailand Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Thailand
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Poor
5.4%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Average
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Average
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Average
5.4%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Thailand Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 3.1%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Thailand Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Thailand
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Exceptional
76.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Poor
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
81.9%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Thailand Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.2%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 11.9%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.63%), family households (65.0% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.6%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Thailand Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Thailand
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.27
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
6.9%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Tragic
45.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Poor
32.8%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Thailand Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 23.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 12.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 12.1%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Thailand Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Thailand
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
9.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Exceptional
90.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Exceptional
56.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Exceptional
20.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
6.9%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Thailand Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 55.3%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 30.1%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.39%), high school diploma (88.5% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 0.64%), and ged/equivalency (83.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.79%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Thailand Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Thailand
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
95.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
94.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Tragic
92.8%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Tragic
91.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Tragic
90.1%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Tragic
88.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
84.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Fair
64.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Fair
58.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Poor
45.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Poor
36.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Poor
14.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Fair
4.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Average
1.8%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Thailand Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 45.5%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 35.2%), and vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.60%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.6%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Thailand Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Thailand
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Tragic
12.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Tragic
24.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Tragic
48.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.6%