Cherokee vs Laotian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Laotian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Laotians

Fair
Good
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Laotian Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,652,083 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.318. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 2.7 Laotians.
Cherokee Integration in Laotian Communities

Cherokee vs Laotian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($72,682 compared to $94,990, a difference of 30.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $104,993, a difference of 29.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $111,051, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 4.0%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $54,369, a difference of 13.6%), and median female earnings ($34,742 compared to $42,133, a difference of 21.3%).
Cherokee vs Laotian Income
Income MetricCherokeeLaotian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Exceptional
$47,041
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Exceptional
$112,859
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Exceptional
$94,990
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Exceptional
$50,343
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Exceptional
$59,351
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Exceptional
$42,133
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Exceptional
$54,369
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Exceptional
$104,993
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Exceptional
$111,051
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Exceptional
$66,306
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Poor
26.4%

Cherokee vs Laotian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 47.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 41.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 17.9%).
Cherokee vs Laotian Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeLaotian
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
19.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
14.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
14.5%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
19.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
27.0%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Good
10.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Fair
12.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
10.0%

Cherokee vs Laotian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 42.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 26.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.91%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.1%).
Cherokee vs Laotian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeLaotian
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Good
5.2%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Excellent
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Average
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.2%

Cherokee vs Laotian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 3.4%).
Cherokee vs Laotian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeLaotian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Exceptional
65.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Average
79.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Tragic
34.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Poor
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Good
82.9%

Cherokee vs Laotian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 28.8%), divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 22.6%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.9% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (65.0% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.3%).
Cherokee vs Laotian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeLaotian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
65.8%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Excellent
3.26
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Excellent
47.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Exceptional
28.5%

Cherokee vs Laotian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 17.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 6.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.9%).
Cherokee vs Laotian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeLaotian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
9.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Exceptional
58.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.4%

Cherokee vs Laotian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 59.2%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 58.8%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 49.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.54%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.55%).
Cherokee vs Laotian Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeLaotian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Fair
94.6%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Average
92.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Excellent
86.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Exceptional
68.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Exceptional
62.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Exceptional
49.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
42.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
17.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.3%

Cherokee vs Laotian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 52.8%), vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 45.8%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.1%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.5%).
Cherokee vs Laotian Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeLaotian
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
11.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Excellent
2.4%