Cherokee vs Immigrants from Italy Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Italy
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Immigrants from Italy

Fair
Good
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,138
SOCIAL INDEX
78.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
85th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Italy Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 293,340,050 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.421. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Immigrants from Italy. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 25.1 Immigrants from Italy.
Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from Italy Communities

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Italy Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,203 compared to $48,654, a difference of 30.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $105,201, a difference of 30.1%), and median household income ($72,682 compared to $93,465, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 3.6%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $54,449, a difference of 13.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $64,065, a difference of 18.3%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Italy Income
Income MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Italy
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Exceptional
$48,654
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Exceptional
$112,848
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Exceptional
$93,465
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Exceptional
$50,581
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Exceptional
$59,691
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Exceptional
$42,446
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Exceptional
$54,449
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Exceptional
$105,201
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Exceptional
$110,434
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Exceptional
$64,065
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Poor
26.5%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Italy Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 39.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 39.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and single father poverty (19.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 19.8%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Italy Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Italy
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
12.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
18.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Exceptional
12.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
14.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
14.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Fair
16.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
27.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
10.4%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Italy Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 28.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.76%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.4%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Italy Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Italy
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Good
5.1%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Good
5.2%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Average
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Average
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Average
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Average
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Excellent
5.3%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Italy Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.4%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Italy Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Italy
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Fair
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Fair
36.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Poor
74.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
83.2%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Italy Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 27.3%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 22.8%), and divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.060%), family households (65.0% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and currently married (46.9% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.7%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Italy Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Italy
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
64.8%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Exceptional
47.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Exceptional
47.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
11.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Exceptional
29.9%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Italy Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 42.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 29.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 23.0%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Italy Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Italy
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Poor
11.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Poor
89.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Poor
54.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Poor
18.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Poor
6.0%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Italy Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 56.5%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 50.9%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.10%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.35%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Italy Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Italy
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Good
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Good
97.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Average
97.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Good
95.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Good
94.0%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Excellent
91.7%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Excellent
89.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Excellent
66.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Exceptional
61.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Exceptional
49.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
41.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
17.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.1%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Italy Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 50.1%), vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 40.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 9.0%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 9.6%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.8%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Italy Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Italy
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Exceptional
45.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Average
3.0%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Good
2.4%