Cherokee vs Ute Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Ute

Fair
Fair
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ute Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,919,227 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ute within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.128. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 1.2 Ute.
Cherokee Integration in Ute Communities

Cherokee vs Ute Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Ute communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $49,997, a difference of 4.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $83,937, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $52,949, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($72,682 compared to $72,402, a difference of 0.39%), median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $48,899, a difference of 0.47%), and median earnings ($41,252 compared to $41,051, a difference of 0.49%).
Cherokee vs Ute Income
Income MetricCherokeeUte
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Tragic
$36,651
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Tragic
$87,596
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Tragic
$72,402
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Tragic
$41,051
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Tragic
$48,899
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Tragic
$34,960
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Tragic
$49,997
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Tragic
$82,166
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Tragic
$83,937
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Tragic
$52,949
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
27.8%

Cherokee vs Ute Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Ute communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (13.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 24.1%), poverty (14.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 17.8%), and family poverty (10.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (16.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 2.4%), single mother poverty (34.5% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 4.0%).
Cherokee vs Ute Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeUte
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
16.9%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
12.1%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
16.2%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
17.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
25.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Tragic
17.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Tragic
23.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
21.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
21.8%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
15.7%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
28.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Tragic
35.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Tragic
12.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Tragic
12.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
14.7%

Cherokee vs Ute Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 44.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 44.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.0%).
Cherokee vs Ute Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeUte
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Tragic
19.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Tragic
11.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.9%

Cherokee vs Ute Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 2.5%).
Cherokee vs Ute Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeUte
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Tragic
60.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Good
37.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
80.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
78.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Tragic
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
76.6%

Cherokee vs Ute Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 12.9%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 11.1%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.49, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.95%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.2%).
Cherokee vs Ute Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeUte
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Average
64.3%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Tragic
44.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.49
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
7.1%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Tragic
43.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Poor
33.0%

Cherokee vs Ute Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 49.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 13.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 1.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 5.8%).
Cherokee vs Ute Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeUte
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
11.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Exceptional
56.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Exceptional
22.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
8.8%

Cherokee vs Ute Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Ute communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 38.7%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 30.0%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.13%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.14%).
Cherokee vs Ute Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeUte
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Good
97.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Average
96.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Average
95.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Fair
93.4%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Tragic
91.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Tragic
89.0%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Tragic
86.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
81.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Tragic
60.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Tragic
53.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
30.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
11.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.0%

Cherokee vs Ute Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 105.8%), ambulatory disability (7.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 32.0%), and male disability (14.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (28.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 3.3%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 4.7%).
Cherokee vs Ute Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeUte
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Exceptional
0.86%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Tragic
27.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Tragic
52.6%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Average
2.5%