Cherokee vs Ute Community Comparison
COMPARE
Cherokee
Ute
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Cherokee
Ute
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ute Integration in Cherokee Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,919,227 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ute within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.128. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 1.2 Ute.
![Cherokee Integration in Ute Communities](/correlation-charts/comparison/cherokee-vs-ute/cherokee-vs-ute-community-integration.webp)
Cherokee vs Ute Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Ute communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $49,997, a difference of 4.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $83,937, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $52,949, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($72,682 compared to $72,402, a difference of 0.39%), median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $48,899, a difference of 0.47%), and median earnings ($41,252 compared to $41,051, a difference of 0.49%).
![Cherokee vs Ute Income](/correlation-charts/comparison/cherokee-vs-ute/cherokee-vs-ute-income.webp)
Income Metric | Cherokee | Ute |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,203 | Tragic $36,651 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,209 | Tragic $87,596 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $72,682 | Tragic $72,402 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,252 | Tragic $41,051 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,669 | Tragic $48,899 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,742 | Tragic $34,960 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,848 | Tragic $49,997 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,843 | Tragic $82,166 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,125 | Tragic $83,937 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,133 | Tragic $52,949 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.4% | Tragic 27.8% |
Cherokee vs Ute Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Ute communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (13.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 24.1%), poverty (14.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 17.8%), and family poverty (10.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (16.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 2.4%), single mother poverty (34.5% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 4.0%).
![Cherokee vs Ute Poverty](/correlation-charts/comparison/cherokee-vs-ute/cherokee-vs-ute-poverty.webp)
Poverty Metric | Cherokee | Ute |
Poverty | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 16.9% |
Families | Tragic 10.6% | Tragic 12.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 16.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 17.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 25.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.2% | Tragic 17.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.7% | Tragic 23.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 21.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.7% | Tragic 21.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 21.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 15.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Tragic 28.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 18.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.5% | Tragic 35.7% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 11.0% | Tragic 12.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Tragic 12.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 14.7% |
Cherokee vs Ute Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 44.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 44.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.0%).
![Cherokee vs Ute Unemployment](/correlation-charts/comparison/cherokee-vs-ute/cherokee-vs-ute-unemployment.webp)
Unemployment Metric | Cherokee | Ute |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 6.3% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Fair 11.8% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 17.9% | Tragic 19.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.5% | Tragic 11.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.6% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Poor 4.6% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Cherokee vs Ute Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 2.5%).
![Cherokee vs Ute Labor Participation](/correlation-charts/comparison/cherokee-vs-ute/cherokee-vs-ute-labor-force.webp)
Labor Participation Metric | Cherokee | Ute |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.9% | Tragic 60.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 73.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.2% | Good 37.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.9% | Tragic 73.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.1% | Tragic 80.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 78.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.4% | Tragic 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 76.6% |
Cherokee vs Ute Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 12.9%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 11.1%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.49, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.95%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.2%).
![Cherokee vs Ute Family Structure](/correlation-charts/comparison/cherokee-vs-ute/cherokee-vs-ute-family-structure.webp)
Family Structure Metric | Cherokee | Ute |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Average 64.3% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.5% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.7% | Tragic 44.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Exceptional 3.49 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 3.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 7.1% |
Currently Married | Good 46.9% | Tragic 43.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 12.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.7% | Poor 33.0% |
Cherokee vs Ute Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 49.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 13.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 1.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 5.8%).
![Cherokee vs Ute Vehicle Availability](/correlation-charts/comparison/cherokee-vs-ute/cherokee-vs-ute-vehicle-availability.webp)
Vehicle Availability Metric | Cherokee | Ute |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 11.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.4% | Tragic 88.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.9% | Exceptional 56.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Exceptional 22.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Cherokee vs Ute Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Ute communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 38.7%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 30.0%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.13%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.14%).
![Cherokee vs Ute Education Level](/correlation-charts/comparison/cherokee-vs-ute/cherokee-vs-ute-education-level.webp)
Education Level Metric | Cherokee | Ute |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Good 97.4% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Good 97.1% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Average 96.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Average 95.8% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Good 95.0% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Fair 93.4% |
11th Grade | Average 92.4% | Tragic 91.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Tragic 89.0% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.5% | Tragic 86.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.9% | Tragic 81.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.1% | Tragic 60.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.2% | Tragic 53.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.9% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 30.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 11.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 4.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Cherokee vs Ute Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 105.8%), ambulatory disability (7.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 32.0%), and male disability (14.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (28.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 3.3%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 4.7%).
![Cherokee vs Ute Disability](/correlation-charts/comparison/cherokee-vs-ute/cherokee-vs-ute-disability.webp)
Disability Metric | Cherokee | Ute |
Disability | Tragic 14.8% | Poor 11.9% |
Males | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 11.6% |
Females | Tragic 14.9% | Poor 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.8% | Exceptional 0.86% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Excellent 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.5% | Tragic 13.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 27.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.2% | Tragic 52.6% |
Vision | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 3.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.0% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.9% | Excellent 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Average 2.5% |