Cherokee vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,129,191 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.205. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 8.7 Tohono O'odham.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 23.8%), median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $39,543, a difference of 23.1%), and per capita income ($37,203 compared to $30,256, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,742 compared to $33,205, a difference of 4.6%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $45,248, a difference of 5.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $49,121, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 94.7%), family poverty (10.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 92.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 90.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 12.1%), single mother poverty (34.5% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 24.6%), and single female poverty (25.7% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 33.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 86.5%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 82.1%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 66.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 28.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 10.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 45.8%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 35.9%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.9%), family households (65.0% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.53, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 101.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 21.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 9.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 19.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 32.9%), bachelor's degree (30.2% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 23.6%), and associate's degree (38.9% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.35%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.47%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (28.2% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 27.8%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 23.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (14.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.51%), female disability (14.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 0.82%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.95%).