Cherokee vs Malaysian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,837,094 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.099. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 4.9 Malaysians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($72,682 compared to $81,064, a difference of 11.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $94,517, a difference of 9.7%), and wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $50,772, a difference of 4.3%), per capita income ($37,203 compared to $39,194, a difference of 5.3%), and median earnings ($41,252 compared to $43,844, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (19.6% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 31.5%), single male poverty (16.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 27.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and receiving food stamps (13.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 20.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.62%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 11.0%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 8.5%), and births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.92%), family households (65.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and currently married (46.9% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 1.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.38%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 0.030%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.080%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 59.1%), bachelor's degree (30.2% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 9.0%), and associate's degree (38.9% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.18%), ged/equivalency (83.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.71%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 37.0%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 32.2%), and ambulatory disability (7.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.46%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 11.0%).