Cherokee vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Grenada
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Immigrants from Grenada

Fair
Poor
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,656
SOCIAL INDEX
14.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
293rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Grenada Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,046,560 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.718. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.086% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 85.7 Immigrants from Grenada.
Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from Grenada Communities

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Grenada Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 69.5%), median female earnings ($34,742 compared to $41,932, a difference of 20.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $54,538, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $85,552, a difference of 0.67%), median family income ($88,209 compared to $89,249, a difference of 1.2%), and median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $50,279, a difference of 3.3%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Grenada Income
Income MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Grenada
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Tragic
$41,123
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Tragic
$89,249
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Tragic
$76,517
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Fair
$45,596
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Tragic
$50,279
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Exceptional
$41,932
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Exceptional
$54,538
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Tragic
$88,311
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Tragic
$85,552
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Tragic
$50,747
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
16.2%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Grenada Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 48.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 44.3%), and receiving food stamps (13.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (19.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 3.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 7.0%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Grenada Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Grenada
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
15.8%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
14.7%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
16.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
21.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Tragic
14.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Tragic
20.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
21.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
21.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
20.7%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
21.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
16.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Tragic
30.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
7.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Tragic
15.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Tragic
17.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
17.8%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Grenada Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 47.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 43.6%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.5%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Grenada Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Grenada
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
6.9%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
7.6%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Tragic
15.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Tragic
25.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Average
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.3%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Grenada Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 58.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 13.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.3%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Grenada Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Grenada
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Tragic
63.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Tragic
25.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Tragic
67.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
82.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Tragic
83.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
81.0%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Grenada Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.9%), married-couple households (46.7% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 24.6%), and currently married (46.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 1.0%), family households (65.0% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.9%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Grenada Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Grenada
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
62.6%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Tragic
25.2%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Tragic
37.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
8.2%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Tragic
39.1%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Tragic
36.3%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Grenada Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 384.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 183.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 153.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 47.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 108.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 153.0%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Grenada Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Grenada
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
37.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Tragic
62.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Tragic
28.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
9.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
2.7%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Grenada Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 58.5%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 22.8%), and bachelor's degree (30.2% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Grenada Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Grenada
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
95.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
94.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
94.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
93.0%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Tragic
91.6%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Tragic
90.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Tragic
88.4%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Tragic
85.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
81.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Tragic
59.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Tragic
54.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Tragic
42.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
35.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.4%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Grenada Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 91.8%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 87.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 63.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.45%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 4.8%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Grenada Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Grenada
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Fair
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Exceptional
0.94%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Good
11.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Fair
23.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Tragic
47.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
6.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.8%