Cherokee vs Immigrants from Panama Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Panama
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Immigrants from Panama

Fair
Poor
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,936
SOCIAL INDEX
16.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
282nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Panama Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 208,976,742 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Panama within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.315. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Immigrants from Panama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 12.7 Immigrants from Panama.
Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from Panama Communities

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Panama Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 17.1%), per capita income ($37,203 compared to $41,853, a difference of 12.5%), and median female earnings ($34,742 compared to $39,049, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $56,944, a difference of 5.2%), median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $51,962, a difference of 6.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $51,278, a difference of 7.2%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Panama Income
Income MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Panama
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Poor
$41,853
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Tragic
$95,647
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Tragic
$80,873
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Poor
$45,198
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Tragic
$51,962
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Fair
$39,049
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Tragic
$51,278
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Tragic
$89,451
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Tragic
$93,815
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Tragic
$56,944
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
23.4%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Panama Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 27.0%), single father poverty (19.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 23.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.22%), receiving food stamps (13.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and family poverty (10.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 5.7%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Panama Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Panama
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
13.3%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
10.0%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
14.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
19.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Poor
14.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Tragic
18.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
17.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
17.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
17.9%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Poor
29.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Tragic
12.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Tragic
13.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
13.6%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Panama Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 20.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 20.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.41%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Panama Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Panama
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Tragic
12.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Tragic
19.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Tragic
10.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.8%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Panama Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 18.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 3.2%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Panama Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Panama
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Tragic
34.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Tragic
73.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
82.2%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Panama Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.5%), divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 8.9%), and births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.19%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.80%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.8%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Panama Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Panama
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
64.8%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Excellent
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.27
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Average
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Tragic
44.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Tragic
34.2%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Panama Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 89.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 36.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 8.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 29.7%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Panama Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Panama
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
14.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Tragic
85.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Tragic
51.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
17.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
5.7%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Panama Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 29.7%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 25.5%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.59%), and ged/equivalency (83.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.60%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Panama Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Panama
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
95.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
95.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Tragic
91.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Tragic
88.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
84.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Tragic
63.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Tragic
57.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Poor
44.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Poor
36.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Fair
14.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Poor
4.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.6%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Panama Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 53.1%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 44.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.9%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Panama Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Panama
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Poor
11.5%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Fair
11.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Tragic
24.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Poor
17.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.6%