Cherokee vs Soviet Union Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Soviet Union
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Soviet Union

Fair
Good
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,833
SOCIAL INDEX
75.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
103rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Soviet Union Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,360,205 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.880. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.731% in Soviet Union. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 731.1 Soviet Union.
Cherokee Integration in Soviet Union Communities

Cherokee vs Soviet Union Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,203 compared to $54,202, a difference of 45.7%), median family income ($88,209 compared to $119,262, a difference of 35.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $108,457, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 13.2%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $55,340, a difference of 15.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $62,848, a difference of 16.1%).
Cherokee vs Soviet Union Income
Income MetricCherokeeSoviet Union
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Exceptional
$54,202
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Exceptional
$119,262
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Exceptional
$95,098
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Exceptional
$54,290
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Exceptional
$63,382
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Exceptional
$46,556
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Exceptional
$55,340
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Exceptional
$108,457
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Exceptional
$112,008
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Excellent
$62,848
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
24.2%

Cherokee vs Soviet Union Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 47.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 41.6%), and single male poverty (16.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 14.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 16.3%), and male poverty (13.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 18.2%).
Cherokee vs Soviet Union Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeSoviet Union
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
8.3%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
14.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
19.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
27.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Tragic
12.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Tragic
14.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Excellent
11.1%

Cherokee vs Soviet Union Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 48.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 42.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.54%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.59%).
Cherokee vs Soviet Union Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeSoviet Union
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Tragic
11.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Poor
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.9%

Cherokee vs Soviet Union Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 28.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 4.7%).
Cherokee vs Soviet Union Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeSoviet Union
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Average
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Good
83.0%

Cherokee vs Soviet Union Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 46.1%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 39.4%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.6%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.11, a difference of 2.2%), and married-couple households (46.7% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 4.7%).
Cherokee vs Soviet Union Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeSoviet Union
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
60.9%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Tragic
24.8%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Fair
46.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Exceptional
26.3%

Cherokee vs Soviet Union Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 125.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 74.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 62.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 11.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 30.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 62.1%).
Cherokee vs Soviet Union Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeSoviet Union
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
17.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Tragic
82.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Tragic
45.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
14.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
4.4%

Cherokee vs Soviet Union Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 99.4%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 80.6%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 70.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.31%).
Cherokee vs Soviet Union Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeSoviet Union
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Good
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Good
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Good
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
94.6%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Exceptional
71.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Exceptional
55.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
47.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
20.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
6.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.5%

Cherokee vs Soviet Union Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 87.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 67.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 8.8%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 8.8%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.0%).
Cherokee vs Soviet Union Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeSoviet Union
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.1%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Exceptional
0.95%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Fair
2.5%