Cherokee vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Immigrants from Bangladesh

Fair
Poor
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,108
SOCIAL INDEX
18.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
269th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Bangladesh Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,446,094 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.394. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Immigrants from Bangladesh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 5.6 Immigrants from Bangladesh.
Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from Bangladesh Communities

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 30.9%), median female earnings ($34,742 compared to $39,910, a difference of 14.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $54,714, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $55,394, a difference of 2.3%), median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $51,642, a difference of 6.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $92,208, a difference of 7.1%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Income
Income MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Bangladesh
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Poor
$41,709
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Tragic
$94,665
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Tragic
$80,722
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Fair
$45,532
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Tragic
$51,642
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Good
$39,910
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Exceptional
$54,714
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Tragic
$90,448
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Tragic
$92,208
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Tragic
$55,394
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
20.9%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 31.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 29.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (19.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.32%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Bangladesh
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
15.3%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
16.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
21.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Tragic
14.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Tragic
20.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
19.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
19.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
22.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Tragic
31.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
7.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Tragic
14.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Tragic
15.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
15.9%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 21.3%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 21.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.79%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.8%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Bangladesh
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
6.5%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
6.5%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Tragic
21.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
8.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Good
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.4%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 33.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 2.2%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Bangladesh
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Tragic
64.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Tragic
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Tragic
30.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Tragic
70.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
80.7%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.7%), divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 25.2%), and births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.24%), single mother households (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.85%), and family households (65.0% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.7%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Bangladesh
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Tragic
43.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.36
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
6.9%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Tragic
43.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
11.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Good
30.9%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 232.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 98.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 83.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 24.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 54.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 83.7%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Bangladesh
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
25.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Tragic
74.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Tragic
38.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
12.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
3.9%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 80.9%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 36.1%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.6%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Bangladesh
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
95.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
92.4%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Tragic
91.0%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Tragic
89.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Tragic
88.0%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Tragic
85.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
81.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Tragic
61.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Tragic
56.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Fair
45.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Average
37.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Average
1.8%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 107.7%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 73.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 54.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.75%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.4%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Bangladesh
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Exceptional
0.85%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
5.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Excellent
10.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.6%