Cherokee vs Immigrants from France Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from France
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Immigrants from France

Fair
Excellent
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,515
SOCIAL INDEX
82.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
69th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from France Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,686,487 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from France within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.244. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Immigrants from France. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 7.9 Immigrants from France.
Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from France Communities

Cherokee vs Immigrants from France Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,203 compared to $54,557, a difference of 46.7%), median family income ($88,209 compared to $120,076, a difference of 36.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $108,257, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.10%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $53,805, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $66,826, a difference of 23.4%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from France Income
Income MetricCherokeeImmigrants from France
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Exceptional
$54,557
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Exceptional
$120,076
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Exceptional
$96,743
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Exceptional
$53,490
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Exceptional
$63,715
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Exceptional
$44,541
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Exceptional
$53,805
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Exceptional
$108,257
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Exceptional
$113,680
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Exceptional
$66,826
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
27.4%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from France Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 38.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 36.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.58%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 6.1%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from France Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeImmigrants from France
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Excellent
11.9%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Good
10.9%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Excellent
12.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
21.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Exceptional
12.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
14.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
19.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Poor
12.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
10.1%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from France Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 35.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 24.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.7%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from France Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeImmigrants from France
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Average
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Average
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
6.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Excellent
5.2%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from France Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 14.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.3%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from France Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeImmigrants from France
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Tragic
35.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Good
83.0%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from France Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.4%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 26.5%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.2%), currently married (46.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and married-couple households (46.7% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 2.9%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from France Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeImmigrants from France
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
61.3%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Tragic
45.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Fair
46.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Exceptional
29.0%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from France Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 67.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 37.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 15.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 30.3%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from France Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from France
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
12.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Tragic
87.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
17.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
5.6%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from France Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 106.5%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 97.0%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 78.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.15%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from France Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeImmigrants from France
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Exceptional
92.4%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
87.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Exceptional
71.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Exceptional
65.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Exceptional
53.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
46.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
20.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
6.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.9%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from France Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 53.1%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 49.7%), and vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 3.4%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 9.7%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 24.9%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from France Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from France
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
11.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Exceptional
45.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Fair
17.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.3%