Cherokee vs Yup'ik Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yup'ik
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Yup'ik

Fair
Fair
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,388
SOCIAL INDEX
21.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
262nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yup'ik Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,376,388 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.363. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.032% in Yup'ik. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 32.1 Yup'ik.
Cherokee Integration in Yup'ik Communities

Cherokee vs Yup'ik Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $39,504, a difference of 23.2%), per capita income ($37,203 compared to $30,518, a difference of 21.9%), and median earnings ($41,252 compared to $35,942, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($72,682 compared to $69,695, a difference of 4.3%), median female earnings ($34,742 compared to $32,730, a difference of 6.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $81,000, a difference of 6.3%).
Cherokee vs Yup'ik Income
Income MetricCherokeeYup'ik
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Tragic
$30,518
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Tragic
$79,290
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Tragic
$69,695
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Tragic
$35,942
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Tragic
$39,504
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Tragic
$32,730
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Exceptional
$54,732
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Tragic
$73,688
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Tragic
$81,000
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Average
$60,727
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
24.7%

Cherokee vs Yup'ik Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.2% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 146.7%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 132.3%), and single male poverty (16.1% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 97.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (25.7% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 3.7%), single mother poverty (34.5% compared to 32.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 19.2%).
Cherokee vs Yup'ik Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeYup'ik
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
20.8%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
18.7%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
21.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
27.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Tragic
24.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Tragic
27.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
25.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
24.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
25.8%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
26.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
32.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Tragic
32.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
13.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Tragic
14.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Tragic
15.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
32.7%

Cherokee vs Yup'ik Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 194.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 189.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 179.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 29.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 74.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 79.6%).
Cherokee vs Yup'ik Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeYup'ik
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
13.6%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
16.4%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
10.9%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Tragic
23.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Tragic
41.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Tragic
20.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Tragic
17.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
18.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
13.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
9.5%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
9.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
12.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
21.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
18.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
11.0%

Cherokee vs Yup'ik Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 21.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 12.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 70.9%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 4.1%).
Cherokee vs Yup'ik Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeYup'ik
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Tragic
62.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Tragic
73.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Tragic
33.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Tragic
70.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
73.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
76.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Tragic
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
78.6%

Cherokee vs Yup'ik Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 105.2%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 53.9%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 46.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.7% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 6.0%), family households (65.0% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 11.5%), and currently married (46.9% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 17.6%).
Cherokee vs Yup'ik Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeYup'ik
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
72.4%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Exceptional
37.0%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Tragic
44.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
4.00
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
5.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
10.0%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Tragic
39.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
10.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Tragic
56.4%

Cherokee vs Yup'ik Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 493.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 71.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 58.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 36.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 55.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 58.1%).
Cherokee vs Yup'ik Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeYup'ik
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
45.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Tragic
58.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Tragic
34.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
14.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
5.7%

Cherokee vs Yup'ik Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (38.9% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 55.7%), bachelor's degree (30.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 55.5%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.30%), 5th grade (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and 6th grade (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.40%).
Cherokee vs Yup'ik Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeYup'ik
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
99.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
99.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
99.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
99.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
99.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Tragic
91.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Tragic
87.6%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Tragic
86.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
80.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Tragic
45.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Tragic
39.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Tragic
25.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
19.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
8.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
2.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.3%

Cherokee vs Yup'ik Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 155.5%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 54.2%), and ambulatory disability (7.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 52.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 6.7%), vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 9.6%).
Cherokee vs Yup'ik Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeYup'ik
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Tragic
4.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Tragic
37.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Tragic
61.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.7%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
1.9%