Cherokee vs Tlingit-Haida Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tlingit-Haida
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Tlingit-Haida

Fair
Average
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,201
SOCIAL INDEX
49.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
182nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tlingit-Haida Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,661,157 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.282. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.025% in Tlingit-Haida. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 25.2 Tlingit-Haida.
Cherokee Integration in Tlingit-Haida Communities

Cherokee vs Tlingit-Haida Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,203 compared to $43,516, a difference of 17.0%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $55,914, a difference of 16.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $62,922, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $52,409, a difference of 7.7%), median earnings ($41,252 compared to $45,468, a difference of 10.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $97,417, a difference of 13.1%).
Cherokee vs Tlingit-Haida Income
Income MetricCherokeeTlingit-Haida
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Average
$43,516
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Fair
$101,092
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Fair
$83,968
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Fair
$45,468
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Poor
$52,409
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Average
$39,513
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Exceptional
$55,914
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Fair
$92,987
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Poor
$97,417
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Excellent
$62,922
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
24.0%

Cherokee vs Tlingit-Haida Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 38.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 36.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 3.0%), single mother poverty (34.5% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 11.7%), and receiving food stamps (13.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 14.3%).
Cherokee vs Tlingit-Haida Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeTlingit-Haida
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Good
10.9%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
22.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Fair
13.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
15.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
14.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
15.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
14.7%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
21.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Exceptional
8.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
9.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Average
11.6%

Cherokee vs Tlingit-Haida Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 110.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 41.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.2%).
Cherokee vs Tlingit-Haida Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeTlingit-Haida
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.0%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Tragic
23.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Fair
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
20.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
8.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Good
5.4%

Cherokee vs Tlingit-Haida Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.4%).
Cherokee vs Tlingit-Haida Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeTlingit-Haida
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Exceptional
40.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Exceptional
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
82.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Tragic
82.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
83.9%

Cherokee vs Tlingit-Haida Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 18.6%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 13.8%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.9% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.59%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.91%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.0%).
Cherokee vs Tlingit-Haida Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeTlingit-Haida
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
61.6%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Tragic
45.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Fair
32.2%

Cherokee vs Tlingit-Haida Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 30.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 15.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.1%).
Cherokee vs Tlingit-Haida Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeTlingit-Haida
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Good
10.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Good
55.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Good
19.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
6.8%

Cherokee vs Tlingit-Haida Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 21.2%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 19.8%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.38%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.38%).
Cherokee vs Tlingit-Haida Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeTlingit-Haida
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
97.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
96.6%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
95.7%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Exceptional
91.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
87.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
34.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
12.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Poor
1.7%

Cherokee vs Tlingit-Haida Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (7.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 21.9%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 0.75%), vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 4.0%).
Cherokee vs Tlingit-Haida Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeTlingit-Haida
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
13.5%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
13.8%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Tragic
27.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Tragic
50.6%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
4.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Average
17.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Good
2.4%