Cherokee vs Tlingit-Haida Community Comparison
COMPARE
Cherokee
Tlingit-Haida
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Cherokee
Tlingit-Haida
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,201
SOCIAL INDEX
49.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
182nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tlingit-Haida Integration in Cherokee Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,661,157 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.282. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.025% in Tlingit-Haida. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 25.2 Tlingit-Haida.

Cherokee vs Tlingit-Haida Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,203 compared to $43,516, a difference of 17.0%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $55,914, a difference of 16.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $62,922, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $52,409, a difference of 7.7%), median earnings ($41,252 compared to $45,468, a difference of 10.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $97,417, a difference of 13.1%).

| Income Metric | Cherokee | Tlingit-Haida |
| Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,203 | Average $43,516 |
| Median Family Income | Tragic $88,209 | Fair $101,092 |
| Median Household Income | Tragic $72,682 | Fair $83,968 |
| Median Earnings | Tragic $41,252 | Fair $45,468 |
| Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,669 | Poor $52,409 |
| Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,742 | Average $39,513 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,848 | Exceptional $55,914 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,843 | Fair $92,987 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,125 | Poor $97,417 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,133 | Excellent $62,922 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.4% | Exceptional 24.0% |
Cherokee vs Tlingit-Haida Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 38.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 36.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 3.0%), single mother poverty (34.5% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 11.7%), and receiving food stamps (13.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 14.3%).

| Poverty Metric | Cherokee | Tlingit-Haida |
| Poverty | Tragic 14.4% | Excellent 11.7% |
| Families | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Males | Tragic 13.1% | Good 10.9% |
| Females | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 22.0% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.2% | Fair 13.8% |
| Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.7% | Exceptional 15.9% |
| Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.7% | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Single Males | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Tragic 21.9% |
| Single Fathers | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Single Mothers | Tragic 34.5% | Tragic 30.9% |
| Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Average 11.0% | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.2% | Average 11.6% |
Cherokee vs Tlingit-Haida Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 110.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 41.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.2%).

| Unemployment Metric | Cherokee | Tlingit-Haida |
| Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 5.6% |
| Males | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 6.0% |
| Females | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Youth < 25 | Fair 11.8% | Tragic 12.7% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 17.9% | Tragic 23.5% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.5% | Fair 10.3% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.6% | Tragic 8.7% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 6.0% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Poor 4.6% | Tragic 4.7% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.7% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 6.4% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 6.5% |
| Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.8% |
| Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 20.7% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 8.9% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Good 5.4% |
Cherokee vs Tlingit-Haida Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

| Labor Participation Metric | Cherokee | Tlingit-Haida |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.9% | Excellent 65.5% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 79.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.2% | Exceptional 40.5% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.9% | Exceptional 77.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.1% | Poor 84.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 82.3% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.4% | Tragic 82.5% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.9% |
Cherokee vs Tlingit-Haida Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 18.6%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 13.8%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.9% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.59%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.91%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

| Family Structure Metric | Cherokee | Tlingit-Haida |
| Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Tragic 61.6% |
| Family Households with Children | Average 27.5% | Tragic 26.0% |
| Married-couple Households | Good 46.7% | Tragic 45.1% |
| Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Tragic 3.16 |
| Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.7% |
| Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Currently Married | Good 46.9% | Average 46.7% |
| Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 13.2% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.7% | Fair 32.2% |
Cherokee vs Tlingit-Haida Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 30.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 15.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.1%).

| Vehicle Availability Metric | Cherokee | Tlingit-Haida |
| No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Good 10.1% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.4% | Good 90.1% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.9% | Good 55.8% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Good 19.9% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Cherokee vs Tlingit-Haida Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 21.2%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 19.8%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.38%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.38%).

| Education Level Metric | Cherokee | Tlingit-Haida |
| No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.5% |
| Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.7% |
| Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.7% |
| 1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.7% |
| 2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
| 3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
| 4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
| 5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
| 6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
| 7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 97.5% |
| 8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 97.3% |
| 9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 96.6% |
| 10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.7% |
| 11th Grade | Average 92.4% | Exceptional 94.4% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Exceptional 93.0% |
| High School Diploma | Poor 88.5% | Exceptional 91.4% |
| GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.9% | Exceptional 87.0% |
| College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.1% | Good 65.9% |
| College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.2% | Average 59.4% |
| Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.9% | Tragic 43.0% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 34.6% |
| Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 12.8% |
| Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 4.0% |
| Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Poor 1.7% |
Cherokee vs Tlingit-Haida Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (7.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 21.9%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 0.75%), vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

| Disability Metric | Cherokee | Tlingit-Haida |
| Disability | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 13.5% |
| Males | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 13.8% |
| Females | Tragic 14.9% | Tragic 13.2% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.8% | Tragic 1.5% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 5.9% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 7.7% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.5% | Tragic 13.2% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 27.1% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.2% | Tragic 50.6% |
| Vision | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.9% |
| Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 4.8% |
| Cognitive | Tragic 18.0% | Average 17.2% |
| Ambulatory | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 6.5% |
| Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Good 2.4% |