Cherokee vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 296,396,453 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.448. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from Northern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 3.0 Immigrants from Northern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,203 compared to $46,531, a difference of 25.1%), median household income ($72,682 compared to $90,026, a difference of 23.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $99,232, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 8.6%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $53,185, a difference of 11.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $62,522, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 36.4%), single male poverty (16.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 34.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.25%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 25.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.93%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 24.3%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 22.5%), and divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 62.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 37.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 5.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 14.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 29.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 53.7%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 50.2%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.17%), 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.46%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 52.7%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 52.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 50.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.1%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 7.5%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.6%).