Cherokee vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 191,608,994 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.220. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Costa Rica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 2.5 Immigrants from Costa Rica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($72,682 compared to $85,054, a difference of 17.0%), per capita income ($37,203 compared to $43,464, a difference of 16.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $100,141, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $53,237, a difference of 9.4%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $52,643, a difference of 10.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $59,848, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 28.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 27.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 7.7%), and receiving food stamps (13.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 15.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.61%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 13.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 12.6%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 9.9%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.86%), family households (65.0% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 32.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 33.2%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 32.0%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.50%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.62%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 46.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 44.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 6.0%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.3%).