Cherokee vs Argentinean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Argentinean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Argentineans

Fair
Good
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,055
SOCIAL INDEX
78.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
90th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Argentinean Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 273,487,795 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Argentineans within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.234. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Argentineans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 7.5 Argentineans.
Cherokee Integration in Argentinean Communities

Cherokee vs Argentinean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,203 compared to $49,862, a difference of 34.0%), median household income ($72,682 compared to $93,960, a difference of 29.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $110,103, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.6%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $54,154, a difference of 13.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $65,246, a difference of 20.5%).
Cherokee vs Argentinean Income
Income MetricCherokeeArgentinean
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Exceptional
$49,862
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Exceptional
$112,665
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Exceptional
$93,960
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Exceptional
$50,399
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Exceptional
$60,117
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Exceptional
$41,952
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Exceptional
$54,154
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Exceptional
$103,111
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Exceptional
$110,103
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Exceptional
$65,246
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
27.0%

Cherokee vs Argentinean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 41.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 37.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 11.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.3%).
Cherokee vs Argentinean Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeArgentinean
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Excellent
8.4%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Excellent
12.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
18.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Exceptional
12.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
15.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
14.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
14.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
14.7%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
19.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
15.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
27.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Tragic
11.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Tragic
13.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
10.8%

Cherokee vs Argentinean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 28.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 24.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.60%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.9%).
Cherokee vs Argentinean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeArgentinean
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Poor
18.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Fair
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Good
5.3%

Cherokee vs Argentinean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 20.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 4.0%).
Cherokee vs Argentinean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeArgentinean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Tragic
33.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Tragic
73.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
83.3%

Cherokee vs Argentinean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 22.3%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 22.3%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.030%), currently married (46.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.56%).
Cherokee vs Argentinean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeArgentinean
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Exceptional
47.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Good
47.1%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Exceptional
30.0%

Cherokee vs Argentinean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 44.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 21.3%).
Cherokee vs Argentinean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeArgentinean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
11.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Tragic
88.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Poor
54.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Fair
6.2%

Cherokee vs Argentinean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 79.9%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 60.0%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 57.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.34%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.38%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.39%).
Cherokee vs Argentinean Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeArgentinean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Fair
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Fair
97.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Fair
97.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Fair
95.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Fair
95.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Fair
94.8%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Average
93.7%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Good
92.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Excellent
91.6%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Good
89.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Excellent
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Exceptional
68.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Exceptional
63.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Exceptional
51.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
18.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
5.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.3%

Cherokee vs Argentinean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 64.7%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 53.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 8.3%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 25.0%).
Cherokee vs Argentinean Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeArgentinean
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.1%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
21.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.3%