Cherokee vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 286,434,894 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.157. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 3.2 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($72,682 compared to $89,100, a difference of 22.6%), per capita income ($37,203 compared to $45,220, a difference of 21.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $97,623, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 6.9%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $53,680, a difference of 12.2%), and median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $55,712, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 29.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 28.4%), and single father poverty (19.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 24.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 24.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 19.9%), divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 15.1%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.080%), married-couple households (46.7% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.41%), and currently married (46.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 25.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 38.7%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 31.4%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.21%), high school diploma (88.5% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 0.30%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 52.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 35.9%), and vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.4%).