Cherokee vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 337,271,027 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 17.7 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,203 compared to $43,806, a difference of 17.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $101,387, a difference of 17.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $95,070, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.8%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $51,224, a difference of 7.0%), and median female earnings ($34,742 compared to $38,738, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 32.5%), family poverty (10.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 32.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 10.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 13.5%), and single father poverty (19.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.8%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.50%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 8.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 5.8%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.080%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 0.11%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 27.8%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 27.7%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.11%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 31.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 31.0%), and ambulatory disability (7.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 7.8%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 8.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.5%).