Cherokee vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,152,858 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.648. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.111% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 111.0 Luxembourgers.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,203 compared to $45,663, a difference of 22.7%), median family income ($88,209 compared to $106,183, a difference of 20.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $97,237, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.050%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $50,379, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $60,967, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 48.6%), family poverty (10.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 46.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 8.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 11.4%), and single father poverty (19.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 40.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 32.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 24.6%), single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 22.6%), and divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.10, a difference of 2.6%), and family households (65.0% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 44.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 1.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 40.2%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 35.0%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.17%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 50.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 46.1%), and ambulatory disability (7.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 9.8%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 12.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 27.0%).