Cherokee vs Peruvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 331,874,839 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Peruvians within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.147. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Peruvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 9.5 Peruvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($72,682 compared to $90,261, a difference of 24.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $98,886, a difference of 22.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $105,070, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 7.1%), median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $55,659, a difference of 14.4%), and median earnings ($41,252 compared to $47,628, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 36.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 35.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.7%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 24.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.51%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 16.4%), divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 15.3%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.9% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.64%), married-couple households (46.7% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (65.0% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 45.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 37.4%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 36.9%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.33%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.72%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 56.8%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 54.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 7.2%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 7.8%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.1%).