Cherokee vs Guatemalan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Guatemalan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Guatemalans

Fair
Poor
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Guatemalan Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 373,680,928 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.210. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 7.0 Guatemalans.
Cherokee Integration in Guatemalan Communities

Cherokee vs Guatemalan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 21.2%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $51,525, a difference of 7.7%), and median household income ($72,682 compared to $75,961, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($88,209 compared to $88,295, a difference of 0.10%), median earnings ($41,252 compared to $41,205, a difference of 0.11%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $54,526, a difference of 0.73%).
Cherokee vs Guatemalan Income
Income MetricCherokeeGuatemalan
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Tragic
$37,766
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Tragic
$88,295
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Tragic
$75,961
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Tragic
$41,205
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Tragic
$46,736
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Tragic
$35,695
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Poor
$51,525
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Tragic
$82,331
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Tragic
$87,705
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Tragic
$54,526
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
22.6%

Cherokee vs Guatemalan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 23.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 23.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.26%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and single mother poverty (34.5% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 4.9%).
Cherokee vs Guatemalan Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeGuatemalan
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
15.3%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
13.8%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
16.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Tragic
16.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Tragic
21.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
21.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
21.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
21.4%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
13.8%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
23.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Poor
16.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Tragic
32.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
7.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Tragic
13.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Tragic
14.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
14.4%

Cherokee vs Guatemalan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.27%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.98%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.7%).
Cherokee vs Guatemalan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeGuatemalan
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Tragic
18.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Poor
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Fair
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.3%

Cherokee vs Guatemalan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.79%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.9%).
Cherokee vs Guatemalan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeGuatemalan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Tragic
35.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Good
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
81.2%

Cherokee vs Guatemalan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 13.0%), divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 12.9%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.41%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 5.1%).
Cherokee vs Guatemalan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeGuatemalan
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
65.2%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Exceptional
28.9%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Tragic
43.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.40
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Tragic
42.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Fair
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Tragic
37.1%

Cherokee vs Guatemalan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 42.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 14.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 10.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.3%).
Cherokee vs Guatemalan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeGuatemalan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Poor
11.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Tragic
54.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.0%

Cherokee vs Guatemalan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 98.9%), high school diploma (88.5% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 8.0%), and 10th grade (94.1% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (38.9% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 0.98%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.9%).
Cherokee vs Guatemalan Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeGuatemalan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
3.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
95.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
94.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
94.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
91.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
91.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
89.9%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Tragic
87.9%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Tragic
86.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Tragic
82.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
78.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Tragic
56.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Tragic
51.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Tragic
38.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
31.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
11.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.4%

Cherokee vs Guatemalan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 49.5%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 44.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.2% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 10.4%).
Cherokee vs Guatemalan Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeGuatemalan
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Tragic
25.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.6%