Cherokee vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 432,077,676 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.373. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 13.7 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Czech communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $103,507, a difference of 20.2%), median family income ($88,209 compared to $105,839, a difference of 20.0%), and per capita income ($37,203 compared to $44,595, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 6.4%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $51,421, a difference of 7.5%), and median female earnings ($34,742 compared to $38,992, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Czech communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 43.7%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 43.3%), and family poverty (10.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 11.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 14.0%), and single father poverty (19.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 27.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 26.1%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 20.7%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 20.1%), and divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.20%), family households (65.0% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.77%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.11, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 12.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 0.94%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Czech communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 32.8%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 29.9%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Czech communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 38.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 36.9%), and ambulatory disability (7.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 9.7%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 10.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 14.3%).