Cherokee vs German Russian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
German Russian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

German Russians

Fair
Average
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,821
SOCIAL INDEX
45.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
192nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

German Russian Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,469,840 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of German Russians within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.050. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in German Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 0.4 German Russians.
Cherokee Integration in German Russian Communities

Cherokee vs German Russian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 11.3%), per capita income ($37,203 compared to $40,266, a difference of 8.2%), and median female earnings ($34,742 compared to $37,105, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $55,356, a difference of 2.3%), median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $49,924, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $89,398, a difference of 3.8%).
Cherokee vs German Russian Income
Income MetricCherokeeGerman Russian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Tragic
$40,266
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Tragic
$93,858
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Tragic
$75,856
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Tragic
$43,200
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Tragic
$49,924
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Tragic
$37,105
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Tragic
$45,673
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Tragic
$85,220
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Tragic
$89,398
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Tragic
$55,356
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
24.6%

Cherokee vs German Russian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 17.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.040%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and female poverty (15.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 6.2%).
Cherokee vs German Russian Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeGerman Russian
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
13.4%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Poor
9.4%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
14.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
25.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Tragic
14.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Tragic
18.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
17.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Poor
17.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
17.8%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
13.6%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
23.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Tragic
31.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Average
12.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Average
11.8%

Cherokee vs German Russian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 27.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.6%).
Cherokee vs German Russian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeGerman Russian
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
8.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Good
5.4%

Cherokee vs German Russian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.5%).
Cherokee vs German Russian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeGerman Russian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Exceptional
42.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Exceptional
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Good
82.8%

Cherokee vs German Russian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 14.4%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 10.8%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.2%), single mother households (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 2.5%).
Cherokee vs German Russian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeGerman Russian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
60.9%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Tragic
44.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Poor
6.7%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Tragic
45.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Poor
33.1%

Cherokee vs German Russian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 36.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 12.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.0%).
Cherokee vs German Russian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeGerman Russian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Average
10.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Average
89.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Good
55.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Exceptional
20.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.0%

Cherokee vs German Russian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 22.0%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 20.5%), and bachelor's degree (30.2% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.11%).
Cherokee vs German Russian Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeGerman Russian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Exceptional
93.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Excellent
91.8%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Exceptional
90.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Good
86.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Average
65.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Fair
59.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Poor
45.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Poor
35.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
13.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Fair
1.8%

Cherokee vs German Russian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 28.4%), vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.4%), and ambulatory disability (7.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 8.8%).
Cherokee vs German Russian Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeGerman Russian
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
12.3%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Tragic
24.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Average
47.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Good
2.5%