Cherokee vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,955,593 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.185. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.433% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 433.3 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $62,330, a difference of 15.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $88,446, a difference of 9.4%), and median female earnings ($34,742 compared to $37,905, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $49,748, a difference of 2.2%), median household income ($72,682 compared to $76,383, a difference of 5.1%), and median earnings ($41,252 compared to $43,393, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single mother poverty (34.5% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 14.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 11.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (16.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 0.29%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.57%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 82.6%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 75.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 70.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 28.7%), single mother households (6.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and married-couple households (46.7% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.24%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.5%), and births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 101.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 8.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 4.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 18.6%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 18.0%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (53.2% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 0.41%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.46%), and 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.6%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 22.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.2% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (14.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 0.49%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.2%).