Cherokee vs Immigrants from Zaire Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Zaire
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Immigrants from Zaire

Fair
Fair
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,349
SOCIAL INDEX
31.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
225th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Zaire Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,169,220 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zaire within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.433. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in Immigrants from Zaire. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 32.8 Immigrants from Zaire.
Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from Zaire Communities

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Zaire Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 22.9%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $45,529, a difference of 5.1%), and per capita income ($37,203 compared to $38,848, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($41,252 compared to $41,325, a difference of 0.18%), householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $54,512, a difference of 0.70%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $85,207, a difference of 1.1%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Zaire Income
Income MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Zaire
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Tragic
$38,848
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Tragic
$89,285
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Tragic
$71,801
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Tragic
$41,325
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Tragic
$47,070
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Tragic
$36,017
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Tragic
$45,529
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Tragic
$78,045
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Tragic
$85,207
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Tragic
$54,512
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
22.3%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Zaire Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 18.1%), single father poverty (19.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 13.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.17%), receiving food stamps (13.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.90%), and family poverty (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.3%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Zaire Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Zaire
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
15.1%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
13.8%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
16.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
25.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Tragic
15.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Tragic
21.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
20.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
20.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
13.6%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
23.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
17.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Tragic
32.0%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Poor
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
13.4%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Zaire Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 36.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 27.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.6%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 4.2%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Zaire Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Zaire
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Poor
5.4%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
15.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
9.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Fair
5.5%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Zaire Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 0.86%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.6%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Zaire Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Zaire
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Exceptional
67.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Excellent
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Exceptional
40.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Exceptional
76.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Average
82.8%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Zaire Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (46.7% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 16.6%), currently married (46.9% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 11.9%), and family households (65.0% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 6.3%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Zaire Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Zaire
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
59.2%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Tragic
40.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
7.4%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Tragic
42.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
12.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Tragic
34.5%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Zaire Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 52.0%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 44.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 16.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 37.6%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Zaire Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Zaire
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
11.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Tragic
88.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
16.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
5.1%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Zaire Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 37.3%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 35.3%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.16%), high school diploma (88.5% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.59%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Zaire Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Zaire
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Poor
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Poor
96.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Fair
95.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Fair
94.6%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Tragic
91.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Tragic
88.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
84.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Poor
64.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Poor
58.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Poor
45.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Fair
36.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Fair
14.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Average
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.0%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Zaire Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 56.2%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 47.5%), and ambulatory disability (7.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 6.8%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.9%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Zaire Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Zaire
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Fair
11.9%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Tragic
24.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Good
47.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Poor
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
19.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.3%