Cherokee vs Immigrants from Africa Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Africa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Immigrants from Africa

Fair
Fair
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,479
SOCIAL INDEX
32.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
219th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Africa Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 422,259,964 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.283. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Immigrants from Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 8.6 Immigrants from Africa.
Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from Africa Communities

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Africa Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 18.3%), median female earnings ($34,742 compared to $40,257, a difference of 15.9%), and per capita income ($37,203 compared to $42,950, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $50,609, a difference of 5.8%), median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $53,457, a difference of 9.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $59,837, a difference of 10.5%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Africa Income
Income MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Africa
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Fair
$42,950
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Fair
$100,256
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Fair
$83,289
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Average
$46,564
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Fair
$53,457
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Good
$40,257
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Tragic
$50,609
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Tragic
$90,372
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Poor
$97,284
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Fair
$59,837
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
23.2%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Africa Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 26.4%), single father poverty (19.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 24.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 3.7%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.7%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Africa Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Africa
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
13.4%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
9.9%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
14.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
21.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Poor
14.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Tragic
18.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
18.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
18.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
18.2%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Poor
21.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
15.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Fair
29.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Tragic
11.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Tragic
12.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
12.8%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Africa Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 20.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.37%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Africa Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Africa
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
5.4%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Poor
18.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Average
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Fair
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Fair
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.8%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Africa Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.3%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Africa Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Africa
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Exceptional
67.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Exceptional
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
83.2%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Africa Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.1%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 11.1%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.0%), and family households (65.0% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 4.1%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Africa Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Africa
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
62.4%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Tragic
42.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Good
3.25
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Tragic
43.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Poor
33.0%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Africa Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 61.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 38.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 5.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 15.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 30.9%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Africa Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Africa
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
12.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Tragic
87.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Tragic
51.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
17.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
5.6%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Africa Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 38.5%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 38.3%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.040%), high school diploma (88.5% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and 11th grade (92.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.57%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Africa Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Africa
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
95.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
95.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Tragic
91.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Poor
85.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Average
65.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Average
59.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Good
46.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Good
38.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Excellent
15.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Excellent
2.0%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Africa Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 54.4%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 44.9%), and male disability (14.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.93%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.2% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 18.9%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Africa Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Africa
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Excellent
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Poor
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Fair
11.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Fair
23.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Average
47.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.4%