Cherokee vs Thai Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 425,518,879 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Thais within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.166. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Thais. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 13.0 Thais.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Thai communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($72,682 compared to $110,648, a difference of 52.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $121,778, a difference of 50.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $129,560, a difference of 50.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 11.1%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $59,187, a difference of 23.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $72,099, a difference of 33.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Thai communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 76.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 69.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 68.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 10.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 18.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 33.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Thai communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 47.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 35.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Thai communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 16.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Thai communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 52.6%), single father households (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 36.3%), and divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.2%), family households (65.0% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and currently married (46.9% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Thai communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 24.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 15.9%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.55%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Thai communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 91.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 90.3%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 86.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.030%), 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.12%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Thai communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 80.2%), vision disability (2.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 67.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 67.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 10.6%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 11.6%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 38.3%).