Cherokee vs Yuman Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,306,808 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yuman within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.040. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.023% in Yuman. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 22.9 Yuman.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 17.5%), median family income ($88,209 compared to $78,055, a difference of 13.0%), and per capita income ($37,203 compared to $33,236, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,742 compared to $35,377, a difference of 1.8%), householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $53,110, a difference of 1.9%), and median earnings ($41,252 compared to $39,523, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 68.9%), family poverty (10.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 57.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.7% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 55.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 5.7%), single mother poverty (34.5% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 9.4%), and single female poverty (25.7% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 223.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 108.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 104.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 22.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 45.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 70.3%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 41.3%), single father households (2.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 25.6%), and births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 6.7%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 7.3%), and married-couple households (46.7% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 91.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 8.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 15.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 42.9%), associate's degree (38.9% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 24.4%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.45%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.48%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 87.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 27.6%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.51%), male disability (14.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.68%), and ambulatory disability (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.94%).