Cherokee vs Macedonian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Macedonian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Macedonians

Fair
Excellent
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,797
SOCIAL INDEX
85.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
47th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Macedonian Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,036,201 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Macedonians within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Macedonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 9.5 Macedonians.
Cherokee Integration in Macedonian Communities

Cherokee vs Macedonian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,203 compared to $47,573, a difference of 27.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $101,882, a difference of 26.0%), and median household income ($72,682 compared to $90,761, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 4.2%), householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $61,564, a difference of 13.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $54,563, a difference of 14.0%).
Cherokee vs Macedonian Income
Income MetricCherokeeMacedonian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Exceptional
$47,573
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Exceptional
$109,668
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Exceptional
$90,761
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Exceptional
$49,893
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Exceptional
$59,522
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Exceptional
$41,286
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Exceptional
$54,563
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Exceptional
$101,882
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Exceptional
$107,074
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Good
$61,564
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
28.6%

Cherokee vs Macedonian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 43.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 37.4%), and family poverty (10.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.2%), single father poverty (19.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 11.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 11.2%).
Cherokee vs Macedonian Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeMacedonian
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
11.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
18.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Exceptional
11.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
15.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
14.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
14.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
14.7%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Fair
12.9%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
18.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Exceptional
9.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
9.9%

Cherokee vs Macedonian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 30.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.1%).
Cherokee vs Macedonian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeMacedonian
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Good
5.2%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
16.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Excellent
5.3%

Cherokee vs Macedonian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.7%).
Cherokee vs Macedonian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeMacedonian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Exceptional
37.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Exceptional
76.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
83.5%

Cherokee vs Macedonian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 31.6%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 31.2%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.6%), family households (65.0% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and married-couple households (46.7% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.9%).
Cherokee vs Macedonian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeMacedonian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
63.7%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Exceptional
47.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Exceptional
48.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Exceptional
27.9%

Cherokee vs Macedonian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 57.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 40.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 5.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 12.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 29.7%).
Cherokee vs Macedonian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeMacedonian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
12.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Tragic
87.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Tragic
53.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
17.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
5.5%

Cherokee vs Macedonian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 47.0%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 44.4%), and bachelor's degree (30.2% compared to 41.4%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.0%), 5th grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.010%), and 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.020%).
Cherokee vs Macedonian Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeMacedonian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
97.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
95.2%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Exceptional
92.9%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Exceptional
67.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Exceptional
61.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Exceptional
49.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
41.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
16.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Excellent
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.9%

Cherokee vs Macedonian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 48.4%), vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 45.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 9.0%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 10.7%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.7%).
Cherokee vs Macedonian Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeMacedonian
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
21.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Exceptional
45.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Fair
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.4%