Cherokee vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Fair
Fair
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,563,527 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.345. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.041% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 41.5 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.
Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 20.0%), median female earnings ($34,742 compared to $38,028, a difference of 9.5%), and median household income ($72,682 compared to $78,682, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $48,749, a difference of 1.9%), median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $50,298, a difference of 3.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $57,114, a difference of 5.5%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income
Income MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Tragic
$39,827
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Tragic
$94,472
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Tragic
$78,682
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Tragic
$43,998
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Tragic
$50,298
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Tragic
$38,028
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Tragic
$48,749
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Tragic
$86,736
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Tragic
$91,385
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Tragic
$57,114
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
22.8%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 22.3%), single father poverty (19.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 19.3%), and single female poverty (25.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.31%), male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.55%), and family poverty (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.64%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
14.2%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
10.5%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
15.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Tragic
20.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
19.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
19.7%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Tragic
30.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Fair
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Good
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
12.9%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 33.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.6%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 6.1%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Good
5.2%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
15.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
7.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Good
5.4%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.1%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Exceptional
66.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Exceptional
39.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Exceptional
76.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
82.0%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.1%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 11.5%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.9%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.29, a difference of 3.3%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 3.4%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
62.6%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Tragic
43.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Tragic
44.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Poor
32.9%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 34.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 24.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 11.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 22.2%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Average
89.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Tragic
53.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Fair
6.2%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 80.8%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 19.9%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.0%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
95.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
94.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
93.1%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Tragic
91.8%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Tragic
90.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Tragic
88.9%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Tragic
86.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
83.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Tragic
62.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Tragic
56.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Tragic
43.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
35.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
13.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Poor
1.7%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 57.1%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 43.1%), and vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.9%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Poor
24.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Average
2.5%