Cherokee vs Chinese In Labor Force | Age 25-29
COMPARE
Cherokee
Chinese
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Comparison
Cherokee
Chinese
82.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
84.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
12.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Chinese In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,231,210 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.046 and weighted average of 82.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,804,747 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.071 and weighted average of 84.3%, a difference of 2.7%.
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cherokee | Chinese |
| Minimum | 25.0% | 56.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 75.0% | 43.7% |
| Mean | 77.3% | 83.8% |
| Median | 79.1% | 85.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 71.2% | 82.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 83.4% | 88.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.2% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.2% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.2% | 10.8% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Yaqui (82.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Mexico (82.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Hispanic or Latino (82.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Alaskan Athabascan (82.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and Osage (82.3%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 82.5% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 82.4% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 82.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 82.3% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 82.3% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 82.2% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 82.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 82.1% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 82.0% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.9% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 81.7% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 81.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 81.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Jordan (84.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Venezuela (84.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Armenia (84.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Indonesia (84.4%, a difference of 0.010%), and Subsaharan African (84.3%, a difference of 0.020%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 15.6 /100 | #203 | Poor 84.4% |
| Venezuelans | 15.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 84.4% |
| Ecuadorians | 14.8 /100 | #205 | Poor 84.4% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 14.3 /100 | #206 | Poor 84.4% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 13.3 /100 | #207 | Poor 84.4% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 13.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 84.4% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 12.8 /100 | #209 | Poor 84.4% |
| Chinese | 12.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 84.3% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 12.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 84.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 11.7 /100 | #212 | Poor 84.3% |
| Japanese | 11.4 /100 | #213 | Poor 84.3% |
| Lebanese | 11.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 84.3% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 10.7 /100 | #215 | Poor 84.3% |
| Israelis | 9.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 84.3% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 9.3 /100 | #217 | Tragic 84.3% |