Cherokee vs Swedish Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Swedish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Swedes

Fair
Excellent
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,881
SOCIAL INDEX
86.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
41st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Swedish Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,041,877 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Swedes within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.035. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Swedes. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 1.3 Swedes.
Cherokee Integration in Swedish Communities

Cherokee vs Swedish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $106,377, a difference of 23.5%), median family income ($88,209 compared to $108,499, a difference of 23.0%), and per capita income ($37,203 compared to $45,750, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 7.3%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $52,986, a difference of 10.7%), and median female earnings ($34,742 compared to $39,421, a difference of 13.5%).
Cherokee vs Swedish Income
Income MetricCherokeeSwedish
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Exceptional
$45,750
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Exceptional
$108,499
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Exceptional
$88,524
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Excellent
$47,851
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Exceptional
$57,445
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Fair
$39,421
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Excellent
$52,986
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Exceptional
$99,136
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Exceptional
$106,377
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Excellent
$62,736
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
29.4%

Cherokee vs Swedish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 49.5%), family poverty (10.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 48.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 12.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 18.4%), and single father poverty (19.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 20.5%).
Cherokee vs Swedish Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeSwedish
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
7.1%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Average
20.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Exceptional
12.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
15.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
13.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
13.7%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Good
20.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Excellent
28.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Exceptional
8.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
10.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
9.2%

Cherokee vs Swedish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 26.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 25.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.6%).
Cherokee vs Swedish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeSwedish
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
15.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Excellent
7.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.7%

Cherokee vs Swedish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.4%).
Cherokee vs Swedish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeSwedish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Exceptional
44.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Exceptional
78.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
83.7%

Cherokee vs Swedish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.1%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 23.7%), and divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.45%), family households (65.0% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.73%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.10, a difference of 2.7%).
Cherokee vs Swedish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeSwedish
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Exceptional
49.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Exceptional
50.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Exceptional
29.6%

Cherokee vs Swedish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 0.030%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.6%).
Cherokee vs Swedish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeSwedish
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
6.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Exceptional
93.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Exceptional
61.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.6%

Cherokee vs Swedish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 37.9%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.9%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.33%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.34%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.34%).
Cherokee vs Swedish Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeSwedish
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
97.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
96.7%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
95.9%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Exceptional
94.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Exceptional
93.7%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Exceptional
92.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
88.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Exceptional
68.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Exceptional
48.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Good
39.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Good
15.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Good
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Excellent
2.0%

Cherokee vs Swedish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 40.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 35.0%), and ambulatory disability (7.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 8.8%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 10.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 12.1%).
Cherokee vs Swedish Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeSwedish
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.3%