Cherokee vs Immigrants from Eastern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 424,440,114 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Europe within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.326. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Eastern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 3.8 Immigrants from Eastern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,203 compared to $49,316, a difference of 32.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $104,662, a difference of 29.5%), and median household income ($72,682 compared to $93,051, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 4.0%), householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $62,693, a difference of 15.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $55,572, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 43.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 43.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.76%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 18.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 32.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.49%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.59%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 33.0%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 31.7%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.39%), married-couple households (46.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (65.0% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 75.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 42.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 6.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 15.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 32.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 59.2%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 54.6%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.18%), 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 53.5%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 49.3%), and vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 43.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 8.4%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 9.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.4%).