Cherokee vs Immigrants from Philippines Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 426,836,989 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.119. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Philippines. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 3.2 Immigrants from Philippines.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($72,682 compared to $93,899, a difference of 29.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $102,910, a difference of 27.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $108,471, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 11.1%), median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $55,809, a difference of 14.7%), and median earnings ($41,252 compared to $48,266, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 47.6%), single male poverty (16.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 47.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.92%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 23.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 22.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.99%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 21.4%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 20.5%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.9% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.4%), family households (65.0% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 10.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 10.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 0.41%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.97%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 48.3%), bachelor's degree (30.2% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 20.6%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.32%), high school diploma (88.5% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 0.82%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 52.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 48.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 3.0%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 7.5%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.9%).