Cherokee vs Ugandan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,387,354 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 3.4 Ugandans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,203 compared to $45,047, a difference of 21.1%), median family income ($88,209 compared to $106,541, a difference of 20.8%), and median household income ($72,682 compared to $87,557, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $50,923, a difference of 6.4%), householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $61,177, a difference of 13.0%), and median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $55,290, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 30.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 28.5%), and single female poverty (25.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 29.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.43%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 21.9%), divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 16.5%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.17%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.5%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 47.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 35.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 12.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 29.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 55.3%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 53.2%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 55.8%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 46.5%), and vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 8.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.5%).