Cherokee vs Chinese Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Cherokee
Chinese
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Cherokee
Chinese
36.7%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
30.2%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
87.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Chinese Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,419,943 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.316 and weighted average of 36.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,513,648 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.522 and weighted average of 30.2%, a difference of 21.3%.
![Cherokee vs Chinese Births to Unmarried Women](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/births-to-unmarried-women/cherokee-vs-chinese-births-to-unmarried-women-chart.webp)
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cherokee | Chinese |
Minimum | 13.9% | 5.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 86.1% | 94.5% |
Mean | 47.7% | 41.4% |
Median | 42.9% | 33.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 35.4% | 24.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 55.8% | 48.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 20.5% | 24.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.1% | 25.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.0% | 25.4% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Subsaharan African (36.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Senegal (36.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Central American (36.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Comanche (36.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Nicaraguan (36.6%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Americans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 36.4% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 36.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 36.5% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 36.5% |
French American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 36.6% |
Nicaraguans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 36.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 36.7% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 36.7% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 36.7% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 36.7% |
Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 36.7% |
Senegalese | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 36.8% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 36.8% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 36.8% |
Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 36.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are European (30.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Vietnamese (30.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Croatian (30.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Icelander (30.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Syrian (30.2%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Ugandans | 89.2 /100 | #120 | Excellent 30.1% |
Koreans | 88.9 /100 | #121 | Excellent 30.1% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 88.7 /100 | #122 | Excellent 30.1% |
Syrians | 88.2 /100 | #123 | Excellent 30.2% |
Croatians | 88.0 /100 | #124 | Excellent 30.2% |
Vietnamese | 87.7 /100 | #125 | Excellent 30.2% |
Europeans | 87.2 /100 | #126 | Excellent 30.2% |
Chinese | 87.1 /100 | #127 | Excellent 30.2% |
Icelanders | 86.0 /100 | #128 | Excellent 30.3% |
Immigrants | Spain | 85.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 30.3% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 85.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 30.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 85.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 30.3% |
New Zealanders | 85.5 /100 | #132 | Excellent 30.3% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 85.2 /100 | #133 | Excellent 30.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 85.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 30.4% |