Cherokee vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,141,150 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.071. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 4.6 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 19.7%), median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $45,607, a difference of 6.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $56,768, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($88,209 compared to $87,387, a difference of 0.94%), median female earnings ($34,742 compared to $35,114, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $85,187, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (19.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 25.3%), single male poverty (16.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 16.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.19%), receiving food stamps (13.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 51.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 26.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.78%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 14.5%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 13.6%), and divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.4%), married-couple households (46.7% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (65.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 22.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 42.6%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 28.7%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.80%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.80%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 48.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 22.5%), and vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 4.4%).