Cherokee vs Immigrants from Nepal Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Nepal
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Immigrants from Nepal

Fair
Good
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,773
SOCIAL INDEX
75.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
106th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Nepal Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,467,335 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.231. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Nepal. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 1.2 Immigrants from Nepal.
Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from Nepal Communities

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Nepal Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($72,682 compared to $87,046, a difference of 19.8%), median family income ($88,209 compared to $104,966, a difference of 19.0%), and per capita income ($37,203 compared to $44,187, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $52,611, a difference of 10.0%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 10.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $61,843, a difference of 14.2%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Nepal Income
Income MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Nepal
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Good
$44,187
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Good
$104,966
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Good
$87,046
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Excellent
$47,925
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Good
$55,615
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Excellent
$40,704
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Good
$52,611
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Good
$95,322
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Good
$102,190
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Good
$61,843
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Excellent
24.9%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Nepal Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 35.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 34.2%), and single father poverty (19.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 8.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 9.8%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Nepal Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Nepal
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Good
12.2%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Good
11.0%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Good
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Excellent
16.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Good
15.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Good
15.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Good
15.9%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
20.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
10.6%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Nepal Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 37.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 36.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.7%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Nepal Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Nepal
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.1%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Nepal Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 4.8%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Nepal Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Nepal
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Exceptional
68.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
81.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Exceptional
76.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
84.0%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Nepal Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 24.0%), divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 18.8%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.69%), currently married (46.9% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and married-couple households (46.7% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 3.4%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Nepal Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Nepal
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
62.7%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Poor
3.21
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Fair
6.4%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Fair
46.1%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Exceptional
29.6%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Nepal Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 39.0%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 35.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 30.4%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Nepal Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Nepal
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Average
10.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Fair
89.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Tragic
53.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
17.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
5.6%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Nepal Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 49.9%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 49.2%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.040%), 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.62%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Nepal Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Nepal
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Fair
95.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Fair
94.8%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Average
93.7%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Average
91.2%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Good
86.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Exceptional
67.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Exceptional
62.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Exceptional
49.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
41.7%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
17.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.2%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Nepal Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 69.6%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 55.2%), and vision disability (2.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.36%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 7.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 24.7%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Nepal Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Nepal
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Exceptional
1.0%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Excellent
22.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Exceptional
46.6%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.2%