Cherokee vs Immigrants from Scotland Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Scotland
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Immigrants from Scotland

Fair
Excellent
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,011
SOCIAL INDEX
87.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
36th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Scotland Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 185,518,321 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.083. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Immigrants from Scotland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 0.4 Immigrants from Scotland.
Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from Scotland Communities

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Scotland Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,203 compared to $49,893, a difference of 34.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $112,175, a difference of 30.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $105,089, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 4.8%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $52,638, a difference of 10.0%), and median female earnings ($34,742 compared to $41,771, a difference of 20.2%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Scotland Income
Income MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Scotland
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Exceptional
$49,893
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Exceptional
$114,392
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Exceptional
$94,091
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Exceptional
$50,741
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Exceptional
$61,220
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Exceptional
$41,771
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Good
$52,638
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Exceptional
$105,089
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Exceptional
$112,175
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Exceptional
$66,620
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
28.7%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Scotland Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 47.2%), family poverty (10.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 44.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 14.0%), single father poverty (19.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 17.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 18.0%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Scotland Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Scotland
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
11.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
18.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
13.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
14.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
14.0%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
19.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
16.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
27.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Exceptional
9.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
9.0%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Scotland Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 23.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.6%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Scotland Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Scotland
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Average
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Good
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.2%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Scotland Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.0%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Scotland Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Scotland
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Tragic
64.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Average
79.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Exceptional
38.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Exceptional
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Excellent
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Good
83.0%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Scotland Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.3%), single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.2%), and births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.39%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.12, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 2.5%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Scotland Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Scotland
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Exceptional
49.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.12
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Excellent
30.4%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Scotland Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 16.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 10.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.69%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 7.7%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Scotland Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Scotland
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
8.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Exceptional
91.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Exceptional
58.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Exceptional
20.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Excellent
6.7%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Scotland Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 59.5%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 52.9%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.090%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Scotland Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Scotland
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
95.2%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Exceptional
94.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
88.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Exceptional
69.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Exceptional
63.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Exceptional
50.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
42.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
17.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.2%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Scotland Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 43.9%), vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 39.3%), and ambulatory disability (7.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 11.0%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 11.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.2%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Scotland Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Scotland
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Good
12.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Good
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
16.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Good
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.4%