Cherokee vs Turkish Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Turkish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Turks

Fair
Exceptional
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,373
SOCIAL INDEX
91.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
17th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Turkish Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 251,385,520 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Turks within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.002. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Turks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 0.2 Turks.
Cherokee Integration in Turkish Communities

Cherokee vs Turkish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,203 compared to $52,391, a difference of 40.8%), median family income ($88,209 compared to $121,202, a difference of 37.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $117,814, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.0%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $54,266, a difference of 13.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $68,037, a difference of 25.7%).
Cherokee vs Turkish Income
Income MetricCherokeeTurkish
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Exceptional
$52,391
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Exceptional
$121,202
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Exceptional
$99,389
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Exceptional
$53,919
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Exceptional
$64,253
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Exceptional
$44,695
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Exceptional
$54,266
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Exceptional
$110,318
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Exceptional
$117,814
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Exceptional
$68,037
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
27.7%

Cherokee vs Turkish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 50.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 49.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 16.3%).
Cherokee vs Turkish Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeTurkish
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
7.5%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Exceptional
11.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
14.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
13.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
13.7%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
18.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
15.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
26.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
9.5%

Cherokee vs Turkish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 32.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 25.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.3%).
Cherokee vs Turkish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeTurkish
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Average
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.0%

Cherokee vs Turkish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 13.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 4.5%).
Cherokee vs Turkish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeTurkish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Tragic
35.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Tragic
73.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
83.8%

Cherokee vs Turkish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 33.6%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 32.7%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.22%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.61%), and currently married (46.9% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.8%).
Cherokee vs Turkish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeTurkish
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
63.6%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Exceptional
27.4%

Cherokee vs Turkish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 50.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 33.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 24.7%).
Cherokee vs Turkish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeTurkish
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
11.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Tragic
88.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Poor
54.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
18.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
5.8%

Cherokee vs Turkish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 88.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 83.5%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 75.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.030%), 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.060%), and 4th grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.090%).
Cherokee vs Turkish Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeTurkish
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Exceptional
91.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
88.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Exceptional
70.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Exceptional
65.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Exceptional
53.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
46.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
19.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
6.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.7%

Cherokee vs Turkish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 60.1%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 56.6%), and vision disability (2.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 52.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 6.2%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 10.0%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 28.4%).
Cherokee vs Turkish Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeTurkish
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.7%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.2%